Add a brainstorm on developing changes that touch real machines #24
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
allod/strategy!24
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "agent/dev-process-brainstorm"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
A brainstorm document on how we develop changes that touch real machines, prompted by a near-miss this week: an inventory field was set on the operator's own development machine, which would have converted it to a new VM runtime the moment a later milestone started reading that field. Nothing in the process caught it; a human noticed.
The document's central finding is that merging to master was never the dangerous act. A machine is built from the deploy flake's committed lock, so nothing reaches a running VM until that lock advances and the machine is rebuilt. The proposal therefore keeps the current merge cadence and adds one question before each merge — does this change any machine actually run? — plus a deliberate activation step and one throwaway machine that takes risky changes first.
Filed in
brainstorm/rather thandev-plans/because it is not scoped work yet: adopting it means memory edits, possibly one tool, and a habit change, and none of that is decided.Refs allod/strategy#20
Risk
R0. A brainstorm document. No runtime behaviour, no generated behaviour, no state.
Validation
The command the proposal rests on was executed against the real composition root while the document was written: the transitive override syntax works, a warm evaluation is about six seconds per machine, and the operator's development machine came out byte-identical under an unmerged branch — which is the inertness proof the proposal asks every landing step to produce.